6
/10

Security Report

https://quakefamilyfun.com/
HIGH RISK
Scan DateSeptember 15, 2026
Scan Time06:18 AM
Open Ports0
Public IP162.159.134.42
AI ModelRule-based (AI unavailable)
2
High Risk
8
Medium Risk
42
Low / Info
0
Total Open Ports
๐Ÿ“‹ Executive Summary

The security scan of quakefamilyfun.com found 52 issues including 2 high-risk and 8 medium-risk findings. The most critical issue is 'Admin Panel Exposed' which requires immediate attention. Full remediation steps are provided for each finding below.

A risk score of 6/10 (HIGH) indicates your business has security issues that need attention. The higher the score, the greater the chance of a breach, ransomware, or data theft.
โšก Top Recommendations
1
Admin Panel Exposed: Restrict access to /admin.
2
Missing DMARC Record โ€” Email Impersonation Risk: Add a DMARC TXT record to your DNS.
3
Missing HSTS Header: Add the HSTS header to your web server.
Admin Panel Exposed
Port HTTPS
HIGH Fix immediately CWE-284 โ–ผ

The path /admin.php returns a restricted-access response (401/403), and its content matches known indicators for this resource, confirming what it is โ€” this exposes administration functionality to anyone on the internet

Publicly reachable admin panels are a primary target for automated attacks. An attacker who can reach /admin.php can attempt brute-force login, exploit known vulnerabilities in the admin software, or leverage it as a stepping stone to full server compromise โ€” without needing any insider knowledge of the site.

Example: Automated bots constantly scan the internet for paths like /admin.php. A business that left a default admin URL accessible was compromised when a bot found it, brute-forced a weak password in minutes, and installed backdoor malware โ€” all without any human attacker being involved.

Restrict access to /admin.php by IP allowlist, move it to a non-standard path, or disable it if not needed. Nginx: 'location ^~ /admin.php { allow YOUR_IP; deny all; }'. Also ensure strong, unique credentials are set for any admin accounts, and enable multi-factor authentication where supported.

Missing DMARC Record โ€” Email Impersonation Risk
Port DNS
HIGH Fix immediately CWE-290 โ–ผ

No DMARC record โ€” your domain has zero email authentication enforcement, making it trivial to impersonate your business

This makes it significantly easier for scammers to send convincing fake emails 'from' your business โ€” a common tactic in invoice fraud and phishing โ€” which can directly cost your customers money and damage trust in your brand.

Example: A scammer sends an invoice-fraud email that appears to come straight from the business's own domain; with no DMARC record in place, nothing tells the recipient's mail provider the message is forged, so it lands in the inbox looking completely legitimate.

Add a DMARC TXT record to your DNS. Go to your domain registrar's DNS settings, add a TXT record for '_dmarc' (not '@') with value: 'v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:youremail@yourdomain.com' Start at p=none โ€” this only turns on reporting, nothing is blocked yet. Review the aggregate reports for a few weeks to confirm every legitimate mail source for this domain (email provider, helpdesk, marketing tools, etc.) is passing DMARC alignment, then move to p=quarantine, and finally p=reject once you're confident nothing legitimate will be caught. Verify at https://mxtoolbox.com/dmarc.aspx

CWE-290 โ€” Authentication Bypass by Spoofing
The login or identity check can be tricked by faking trusted information, letting an attacker in without real credentials.

Missing HSTS Header
Port HTTPS
MEDIUM Fix within 1 week CWE-319 โ–ผ

Missing Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS) โ€” browsers aren't forced to always use HTTPS, leaving visitors open to downgrade attacks

An attacker on the same network as a visitor (public wifi, a compromised router, etc.) can trick their browser into using the insecure version of your site and intercept what they type โ€” raising the odds of stolen logins or payment details.

Example: An attacker on a shared network intercepts a visitor's first request (which defaults to HTTP) before the redirect happens, and silently serves them a fake version of the page instead of the real site.

Add the HSTS header to your web server. Nginx: add 'add_header Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains" always;' in your server block. Apache: add 'Header always set Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=31536000"' in your config. Cloudflare: SSL/TLS > Edge Certificates > enable HTTP Strict Transport Security.

CWE-319 โ€” Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information
Sensitive data is sent over the network unencrypted, so anyone monitoring the connection can read it.

Missing Clickjacking Protection (X-Frame-Options)
Port HTTPS
MEDIUM Fix within 1 week CWE-1021 โ–ผ

Missing X-Frame-Options โ€” your website can be embedded in an attacker's invisible iframe to trick users into unwanted actions

An attacker could trick your customers into clicking hidden buttons โ€” like 'change password' or 'confirm purchase' โ€” without realizing it, potentially leading to account takeovers or unauthorized actions carried out under your brand's name.

Example: An attacker embeds the site's 'delete account' or 'confirm payment' button inside an invisible iframe on their own page, disguised under something like a fake 'play video' button โ€” a visitor's real click triggers the hidden action on your site.

Add the X-Frame-Options header. Nginx: 'add_header X-Frame-Options "SAMEORIGIN" always;' Apache: 'Header always set X-Frame-Options SAMEORIGIN' This tells browsers to only allow your site to be framed by pages on the same domain.

CWE-1021 โ€” Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers (Clickjacking)
The site doesn't prevent itself from being embedded inside another page, which attackers can exploit to trick users into clicking something they didn't intend to.

Missing Content-Security-Policy (CSP)
Port HTTPS
MEDIUM Fix within 1 week CWE-693 โ–ผ

Missing Content-Security-Policy (CSP) โ€” this site has no CSP defense-in-depth layer, so if any cross-site scripting weakness exists elsewhere it's easier to exploit; this finding on its own doesn't mean an XSS vulnerability exists on this site

CSP is a defense-in-depth browser control, not evidence of an active vulnerability by itself โ€” but if an attacker ever manages to slip malicious script onto your site through some other weakness (e.g. a vulnerable plugin or a comment field), a good CSP is often what stops that script from running and stealing customer data such as login sessions or payment details. Without it, that second layer of protection isn't there.

Example: A vulnerable comment form or compromised ad widget lets an attacker inject a script tag; with a properly scoped CSP in place, the browser would refuse to run it โ€” without CSP, that same injected script runs freely and can forward a visitor's session cookie to the attacker.

Add a Content-Security-Policy header, but roll it out carefully โ€” a misconfigured CSP can break legitimate scripts/styles on the site. Start by deploying it in Report-Only mode first, which reports violations without blocking anything: 'add_header Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only "default-src \'self\'; script-src \'self\'; object-src \'none\'; report-uri /csp-report";' Review the reports for a while to catch anything the policy would break, adjust the policy, then switch the header name to 'Content-Security-Policy' (without '-Report-Only') to start enforcing it. For WordPress or complex sites, use https://csp-evaluator.withgoogle.com to help build the policy.

CWE-693 โ€” Protection Mechanism Failure
A security safeguard that should be protecting the system is missing, disabled, or not strong enough.

Environment Secrets Exposed (Unconfirmed)
Port HTTPS
MEDIUM Fix within 1 week CWE-798 โ–ผ

The path /.env returns a restricted-access response (401/403) that is genuinely distinct from how this site handles random nonexistent paths โ€” this confirms *something* is being specially handled at this path, but the response contains no content confirming what it actually is โ€” this exposes credentials or sensitive configuration that should never be public

Exposed credentials in /.env (API keys, database passwords, AWS access keys) give an attacker direct access to your critical systems โ€” databases, cloud infrastructure, third-party APIs, and internal tools. A single exposed credential can lead to total infrastructure compromise.

Example: An AWS credentials file exposed at /.env contained a key with full EC2/RDS access. An attacker used it to launch crypto miners on the account, incurring $50k in charges within 72 hours before discovery. The attacker also captured all database dumps and sold them on underground forums.

1. IMMEDIATELY rotate all exposed credentials (API keys, database passwords, SSH keys). Treat them as fully compromised. 2. Block public access to /.env via web server rules (Nginx: 'location ~ /\.env { deny all; }'). 3. Never commit secrets to version control โ€” use .gitignore and environment variable loaders (python-dotenv, Node's dotenv). 4. Use a secrets manager (AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, Doppler) for production credentials.

CWE-798 โ€” Use of Hard-coded Credentials
A username, password, or key is built directly into the code or configuration, where it can be found and reused by an attacker.

Exposed .git Directory (Unconfirmed)
Port HTTPS
MEDIUM Fix within 1 week CWE-527 โ–ผ

The path /.git/HEAD returns a restricted-access response (401/403) that is genuinely distinct from how this site handles random nonexistent paths โ€” this confirms *something* is being specially handled at this path, but the response contains no content confirming what it actually is โ€” this exposes the site's Git repository metadata, not an admin login

This is not a login page to brute-force โ€” a publicly accessible /.git/HEAD can let an attacker reconstruct this site's Git repository: full source code, configuration files, commit history, internal file paths, and any secrets that were ever committed, even ones later removed from the latest version but never rotated.

Example: A free, widely available tool rebuilds this site's entire source code and commit history from the exposed .git folder within minutes โ€” sometimes turning up a hardcoded API key or password that was deleted from the current code but never actually rotated.

Block public access to /.git/HEAD entirely โ€” it should never be servable. Nginx: 'location ~ /\.git { deny all; }'. Apache: '<DirectoryMatch "\.git"> Require all denied </DirectoryMatch>'. Better yet, don't deploy the .git folder to the live server at all. If any credentials were ever committed to this repo, rotate them โ€” treat them as compromised.

DKIM Not Detected Under Common Selectors
Port DNS
MEDIUM Fix within 1 week CWE-290 โ–ผ

No DKIM record found under common selector names โ€” this does not confirm DKIM is unconfigured, only that it wasn't found under any of the selector names checked; many providers use a custom or provider-specific selector this check can't guess

If DKIM genuinely isn't configured, email providers increasingly use it as a trust signal, and its absence can make legitimate emails more likely to be flagged as suspicious or land in spam. But this check only queries a fixed list of common selector names (default, google, mail, etc.) โ€” many providers assign a random or account-specific selector, so this finding should be treated as 'couldn't confirm DKIM,' not 'DKIM is definitely missing.'

Example: A legitimate invoice email from the business gets flagged as suspicious or dropped into spam by the recipient's mail provider, simply because there's no DKIM signature to prove the message wasn't altered or forged in transit โ€” this only actually happens if DKIM is truly unconfigured, which this check alone can't confirm.

First confirm whether DKIM is actually configured: check your email provider's admin console (Google Workspace: Admin console > Apps > Gmail > Authenticate email; Microsoft 365: Defender > Email authentication > DKIM) for the exact selector name in use, since it's often not one of the common defaults this scan checks. If it turns out DKIM genuinely isn't enabled, turn it on there and add the resulting TXT record to DNS. If you're not sure how to check, share the selector name your provider gives you and this can be verified directly.

CWE-290 โ€” Authentication Bypass by Spoofing
The login or identity check can be tricked by faking trusted information, letting an attacker in without real credentials.

Open Redirect Vulnerability
Port REDIR
MEDIUM Fix within 1 week CWE-601 โ–ผ

the 'redirect_after_login' URL parameter on /i/flow/login redirects to an attacker-controlled external URL when given one, without validating it stays on this domain

Scammers can craft a link that starts with your real, trusted domain but redirects victims to a phishing or malware site โ€” making the scam far more convincing since the link itself looks legitimate.

Example: An attacker emails a link that starts with your real domain (so it looks trustworthy and passes a casual glance) but redirects to a fake login page; victims who enter their credentials there hand them straight to the attacker.

Validate redirect destinations against an allow-list of your own domain/paths before redirecting. Reject or ignore any redirect target that isn't a relative path or doesn't match your domain. Check the 'redirect_after_login' URL parameter on /i/flow/login.

CWE-601 โ€” URL Redirection to Untrusted Site (Open Redirect)
The site redirects visitors to a web address taken from user input without checking it, which attackers can abuse to send victims to a malicious site.

Third-Party Scripts Missing Subresource Integrity (SRI)
Port HTTPS
MEDIUM Fix within 1 week CWE-353 โ–ผ

2 third-party script source(s) loaded without Subresource Integrity (SRI): cdn.rollerdigital.com, www.googletagmanager.com

If any of these third-party providers is ever compromised โ€” a real, recurring attack pattern called a 'watering hole' or supply-chain attack, where attackers hit a widely-trusted vendor instead of you directly โ€” the malicious code they inject would run on your site with no verification and no warning to you or your visitors.

Example: A widely-used analytics or widget provider gets compromised (a real, recurring attack pattern), and because the script loads without integrity verification, the malicious version executes on every visitor's browser with no warning to you or them.

Add integrity and crossorigin attributes to each third-party <script> tag, e.g. <script src="..." integrity="sha384-..." crossorigin="anonymous"></script>. Most CDNs (cdnjs, jsdelivr, unpkg) publish the correct hash on their site โ€” copy it directly.

CWE-353 โ€” Missing Support for Integrity Check
There's no way to verify that data wasn't altered in transit, so tampering would go unnoticed.

Public IP Flagged for Abuse โ€” 162.159.134.42
Port HTTPS
LOW Monitor โ–ผ

Public IP 162.159.134.42 (hosted by Cloudflare, Inc.) has an abuse confidence score of 0/100 from 15 report(s) in the last 90 days on AbuseIPDB.

A flagged IP usually means one of two things: this server has already been compromised and is being used to send spam or attack other systems, or this is a shared-hosting IP where a different customer on the same server is doing something malicious โ€” either way, some mail providers and firewalls will treat traffic from this IP with extra suspicion, which can affect email deliverability and how visitors' security software treats your site.

If this is a dedicated server, check for signs of compromise (unexpected processes, outbound traffic, unfamiliar scheduled tasks) and consider a malware scan. If this is shared hosting, contact your hosting provider โ€” ask whether the IP is shared and whether they can move you to a clean one. You can see the specific reports at https://www.abuseipdb.com/check/162.159.134.42.

Missing Referrer-Policy Header
Port HTTPS
LOW Fix within 1 month CWE-16 โ–ผ

Missing Referrer-Policy โ€” page URLs (which may include sensitive data) are shared with third-party sites your pages link to

If any of your page addresses contain sensitive details (like a password-reset token or account ID), that information could leak to outside sites your pages link to โ€” a small but easily avoidable privacy gap.

Example: A customer clicks an outbound link from a page whose URL happens to include an account ID or a password-reset token, and that full address โ€” token included โ€” is handed to the destination site in the Referer header.

Add: 'add_header Referrer-Policy "strict-origin-when-cross-origin" always;' (Nginx) or 'Header always set Referrer-Policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin' (Apache).

CWE-16 โ€” Configuration
The weakness comes from how the software was configured, not from a flaw in its code.

Missing Permissions-Policy Header
Port HTTPS
LOW Monitor CWE-693 โ–ผ

Missing Permissions-Policy โ€” browser features like camera, microphone, and location aren't restricted for embedded third-party scripts

If you ever embed third-party ads, widgets, or analytics scripts, they could request a visitor's camera, microphone, or location without you intending to allow it โ€” an avoidable privacy risk for your customers.

Example: An embedded ad network's script requests the visitor's location or microphone access through a permission prompt the site owner never intended to allow, simply because nothing in the page's headers restricted it.

Add: 'add_header Permissions-Policy "camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()" always;' Adjust based on what your site actually uses. This limits what ad/analytics scripts can access.

CWE-693 โ€” Protection Mechanism Failure
A security safeguard that should be protecting the system is missing, disabled, or not strong enough.

AWS Credentials Exposed (Unconfirmed)
Port HTTPS
LOW Fix within 1 month CWE-798 โ–ผ

The path /.aws/credentials returns a restricted-access response (401/403) that is genuinely distinct from how this site handles random nonexistent paths โ€” this confirms *something* is being specially handled at this path, but the response contains no content confirming what it actually is โ€” this exposes credentials or sensitive configuration that should never be public

Exposed credentials in /.aws/credentials (API keys, database passwords, AWS access keys) give an attacker direct access to your critical systems โ€” databases, cloud infrastructure, third-party APIs, and internal tools. A single exposed credential can lead to total infrastructure compromise.

Example: An AWS credentials file exposed at /.aws/credentials contained a key with full EC2/RDS access. An attacker used it to launch crypto miners on the account, incurring $50k in charges within 72 hours before discovery. The attacker also captured all database dumps and sold them on underground forums.

1. IMMEDIATELY rotate all exposed credentials (API keys, database passwords, SSH keys). Treat them as fully compromised. 2. Block public access to /.aws/credentials via web server rules (Nginx: 'location ~ /\.env { deny all; }'). 3. Never commit secrets to version control โ€” use .gitignore and environment variable loaders (python-dotenv, Node's dotenv). 4. Use a secrets manager (AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, Doppler) for production credentials.

CWE-798 โ€” Use of Hard-coded Credentials
A username, password, or key is built directly into the code or configuration, where it can be found and reused by an attacker.

SSH Private Key Exposed (Unconfirmed)
Port HTTPS
LOW Fix within 1 month CWE-798 โ–ผ

The path /.id_rsa returns a restricted-access response (401/403) that is genuinely distinct from how this site handles random nonexistent paths โ€” this confirms *something* is being specially handled at this path, but the response contains no content confirming what it actually is โ€” this exposes credentials or sensitive configuration that should never be public

Exposed credentials in /.id_rsa (API keys, database passwords, AWS access keys) give an attacker direct access to your critical systems โ€” databases, cloud infrastructure, third-party APIs, and internal tools. A single exposed credential can lead to total infrastructure compromise.

Example: An AWS credentials file exposed at /.id_rsa contained a key with full EC2/RDS access. An attacker used it to launch crypto miners on the account, incurring $50k in charges within 72 hours before discovery. The attacker also captured all database dumps and sold them on underground forums.

1. IMMEDIATELY rotate all exposed credentials (API keys, database passwords, SSH keys). Treat them as fully compromised. 2. Block public access to /.id_rsa via web server rules (Nginx: 'location ~ /\.env { deny all; }'). 3. Never commit secrets to version control โ€” use .gitignore and environment variable loaders (python-dotenv, Node's dotenv). 4. Use a secrets manager (AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, Doppler) for production credentials.

CWE-798 โ€” Use of Hard-coded Credentials
A username, password, or key is built directly into the code or configuration, where it can be found and reused by an attacker.

Database Config Exposed (Unconfirmed)
Port HTTPS
LOW Fix within 1 month CWE-798 โ–ผ

The path /database.yml returns a restricted-access response (401/403) that is genuinely distinct from how this site handles random nonexistent paths โ€” this confirms *something* is being specially handled at this path, but the response contains no content confirming what it actually is โ€” this exposes credentials or sensitive configuration that should never be public

Exposed credentials in /database.yml (API keys, database passwords, AWS access keys) give an attacker direct access to your critical systems โ€” databases, cloud infrastructure, third-party APIs, and internal tools. A single exposed credential can lead to total infrastructure compromise.

Example: An AWS credentials file exposed at /database.yml contained a key with full EC2/RDS access. An attacker used it to launch crypto miners on the account, incurring $50k in charges within 72 hours before discovery. The attacker also captured all database dumps and sold them on underground forums.

1. IMMEDIATELY rotate all exposed credentials (API keys, database passwords, SSH keys). Treat them as fully compromised. 2. Block public access to /database.yml via web server rules (Nginx: 'location ~ /\.env { deny all; }'). 3. Never commit secrets to version control โ€” use .gitignore and environment variable loaders (python-dotenv, Node's dotenv). 4. Use a secrets manager (AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, Doppler) for production credentials.

CWE-798 โ€” Use of Hard-coded Credentials
A username, password, or key is built directly into the code or configuration, where it can be found and reused by an attacker.

Hosting Network Identified
Port HTTPS
INFO Informational โ–ผ

Public IP 162.159.134.42 is registered to Cloudflare, Inc. โ€” network: CLOUDFLARENET โ€” block: 162.158.0.0 โ€“ 162.159.255.255.

This is informational โ€” it tells you (and anyone else who looks it up) which hosting provider or network actually operates this IP. Useful for confirming you're hosted where you expect, or for context if the IP reputation check above flags anything.

No action required โ€” this is identifying information, not a vulnerability.

โœ… What You're Doing Right

Your server is reachable, which means the web checks and SSL analysis were able to run successfully.

๐Ÿš€ Next Steps

Start with the 2 HIGH risk finding(s) today โ€” these are your most urgent risks. First, address 'Admin Panel Exposed': Restrict access to /admin. Then work through the remaining findings in order of severity.

โฌ‡๏ธ Download PDF
This report is for informational purposes only and represents a point-in-time automated scan. It is not a substitute for a professional penetration test.
Generated by SecureCheck ยท September 15, 2026