4
/10

Security Report

cinteltelecom.com
MEDIUM RISK
Scan DateAugust 28, 2026
Scan Time09:06 AM
Open Ports0
Public IP108.179.252.18
AI ModelRule-based (AI unavailable)
2
High Risk
5
Medium Risk
10
Low / Info
0
Total Open Ports
๐Ÿ“‹ Executive Summary

The security scan of cinteltelecom.com found 17 issues including 2 high-risk and 5 medium-risk findings. The most critical issue is 'cPanel Exposed' which requires immediate attention. Full remediation steps are provided for each finding below.

A risk score of 4/10 (MEDIUM) indicates your business has security issues that need attention. The higher the score, the greater the chance of a breach, ransomware, or data theft.
โšก Top Recommendations
1
cPanel Exposed: Restrict access to /cpanel/ by IP allowlist, move it to a non-standard path, or disable it if not needed.
2
Missing DMARC Record โ€” Email Impersonation Risk: Add a DMARC TXT record to your DNS.
3
HTTP Not Redirecting to HTTPS: Add a permanent redirect from HTTP to HTTPS.
cPanel Exposed
Port HTTPS
HIGH Fix immediately CWE-284 โ–ผ

The path /cpanel/ is accessible without authentication โ€” this exposes administration functionality to anyone on the internet

Publicly reachable admin panels are a primary target for automated attacks. An attacker who can reach /cpanel/ can attempt brute-force login, exploit known vulnerabilities in the admin software, or leverage it as a stepping stone to full server compromise โ€” without needing any insider knowledge of the site.

Example: Automated bots constantly scan the internet for paths like /cpanel/. A business that left a default admin URL accessible was compromised when a bot found it, brute-forced a weak password in minutes, and installed backdoor malware โ€” all without any human attacker being involved.

Restrict access to /cpanel/ by IP allowlist, move it to a non-standard path, or disable it if not needed. Nginx: 'location ^~ /cpanel/ { allow YOUR_IP; deny all; }'. Also ensure strong, unique credentials are set for any admin accounts, and enable multi-factor authentication where supported.

Missing DMARC Record โ€” Email Impersonation Risk
Port DNS
HIGH Fix immediately CWE-290 โ–ผ

No DMARC record โ€” your domain has zero email authentication enforcement, making it trivial to impersonate your business

This makes it significantly easier for scammers to send convincing fake emails 'from' your business โ€” a common tactic in invoice fraud and phishing โ€” which can directly cost your customers money and damage trust in your brand.

Example: A scammer sends an invoice-fraud email that appears to come straight from the business's own domain; with no DMARC record in place, nothing tells the recipient's mail provider the message is forged, so it lands in the inbox looking completely legitimate.

Add a DMARC TXT record to your DNS. Go to your domain registrar's DNS settings, add a TXT record for '_dmarc' (not '@') with value: 'v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:youremail@yourdomain.com' Start at p=none โ€” this only turns on reporting, nothing is blocked yet. Review the aggregate reports for a few weeks to confirm every legitimate mail source for this domain (email provider, helpdesk, marketing tools, etc.) is passing DMARC alignment, then move to p=quarantine, and finally p=reject once you're confident nothing legitimate will be caught. Verify at https://mxtoolbox.com/dmarc.aspx

CWE-290 โ€” Authentication Bypass by Spoofing
The login or identity check can be tricked by faking trusted information, letting an attacker in without real credentials.

HTTP Not Redirecting to HTTPS
Port HTTP
MEDIUM Fix within 1 week CWE-319 โ–ผ

Visiting http:// doesn't redirect to https:// โ€” some visitors may use an unencrypted connection without knowing

Anyone who types or clicks an http:// link is sending their activity on your site โ€” potentially including form data or passwords โ€” unencrypted, where it can be read by anyone on the same public wifi or compromised network.

Example: A customer types the domain into their browser without 'https://', lands on the unencrypted version of the site, and submits a form before ever reaching the secure page โ€” sending that data in plain text the whole time.

Add a permanent redirect from HTTP to HTTPS. Nginx: add 'return 301 https://$host$request_uri;' in your port 80 server block. Apache: add 'RewriteRule ^ https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]' in your .htaccess. Cloudflare users: go to SSL/TLS > Edge Certificates > enable 'Always Use HTTPS'.

CWE-319 โ€” Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information
Sensitive data is sent over the network unencrypted, so anyone monitoring the connection can read it.

Missing HSTS Header
Port HTTPS
MEDIUM Fix within 1 week CWE-319 โ–ผ

Missing Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS) โ€” browsers aren't forced to always use HTTPS, leaving visitors open to downgrade attacks

An attacker on the same network as a visitor (public wifi, a compromised router, etc.) can trick their browser into using the insecure version of your site and intercept what they type โ€” raising the odds of stolen logins or payment details.

Example: An attacker on a shared network intercepts a visitor's first request (which defaults to HTTP) before the redirect happens, and silently serves them a fake version of the page instead of the real site.

Add the HSTS header to your web server. Nginx: add 'add_header Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains" always;' in your server block. Apache: add 'Header always set Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=31536000"' in your config. Cloudflare: SSL/TLS > Edge Certificates > enable HTTP Strict Transport Security.

CWE-319 โ€” Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information
Sensitive data is sent over the network unencrypted, so anyone monitoring the connection can read it.

Missing Clickjacking Protection (X-Frame-Options)
Port HTTPS
MEDIUM Fix within 1 week CWE-1021 โ–ผ

Missing X-Frame-Options โ€” your website can be embedded in an attacker's invisible iframe to trick users into unwanted actions

An attacker could trick your customers into clicking hidden buttons โ€” like 'change password' or 'confirm purchase' โ€” without realizing it, potentially leading to account takeovers or unauthorized actions carried out under your brand's name.

Example: An attacker embeds the site's 'delete account' or 'confirm payment' button inside an invisible iframe on their own page, disguised under something like a fake 'play video' button โ€” a visitor's real click triggers the hidden action on your site.

Add the X-Frame-Options header. Nginx: 'add_header X-Frame-Options "SAMEORIGIN" always;' Apache: 'Header always set X-Frame-Options SAMEORIGIN' This tells browsers to only allow your site to be framed by pages on the same domain.

CWE-1021 โ€” Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers (Clickjacking)
The site doesn't prevent itself from being embedded inside another page, which attackers can exploit to trick users into clicking something they didn't intend to.

Missing Content-Security-Policy (CSP)
Port HTTPS
MEDIUM Fix within 1 week CWE-693 โ–ผ

Missing Content-Security-Policy (CSP) โ€” this site has no CSP defense-in-depth layer, so if any cross-site scripting weakness exists elsewhere it's easier to exploit; this finding on its own doesn't mean an XSS vulnerability exists on this site

CSP is a defense-in-depth browser control, not evidence of an active vulnerability by itself โ€” but if an attacker ever manages to slip malicious script onto your site through some other weakness (e.g. a vulnerable plugin or a comment field), a good CSP is often what stops that script from running and stealing customer data such as login sessions or payment details. Without it, that second layer of protection isn't there.

Example: A vulnerable comment form or compromised ad widget lets an attacker inject a script tag; with a properly scoped CSP in place, the browser would refuse to run it โ€” without CSP, that same injected script runs freely and can forward a visitor's session cookie to the attacker.

Add a Content-Security-Policy header, but roll it out carefully โ€” a misconfigured CSP can break legitimate scripts/styles on the site. Start by deploying it in Report-Only mode first, which reports violations without blocking anything: 'add_header Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only "default-src \'self\'; script-src \'self\'; object-src \'none\'; report-uri /csp-report";' Review the reports for a while to catch anything the policy would break, adjust the policy, then switch the header name to 'Content-Security-Policy' (without '-Report-Only') to start enforcing it. For WordPress or complex sites, use https://csp-evaluator.withgoogle.com to help build the policy.

CWE-693 โ€” Protection Mechanism Failure
A security safeguard that should be protecting the system is missing, disabled, or not strong enough.

Apache Server Status Exposed (Unconfirmed)
Port HTTPS
MEDIUM Fix within 1 week CWE-200 โ–ผ

The path /server-status returns a restricted-access response (401/403) that is genuinely distinct from how this site handles random nonexistent paths โ€” this confirms *something* is being specially handled at this path, but the response contains no content confirming what it actually is โ€” this exposes internal server diagnostic information, not a login panel

This page reveals internal details about the server's configuration, active connections, or recent errors โ€” not something the general public should be able to see, and useful reconnaissance an attacker can use to plan a more targeted attack elsewhere on the site.

Example: An attacker reviews this page to learn internal server details, request patterns, or recent error messages, then uses that information to plan a more targeted attack elsewhere on the site instead of guessing blind.

Restrict access to /server-status by IP allowlist, or disable it entirely if not needed. Nginx: 'location ^~ /server-status { allow YOUR_IP; deny all; }'. Apache ('server-status'/'server-info'): add 'Require ip YOUR_IP' inside the relevant <Location> block, or remove the module if unused.

CWE-200 โ€” Exposure of Sensitive Information
The system reveals information to someone who shouldn't have access to it.

Missing MIME Sniffing Protection
Port HTTPS
LOW Fix within 1 month CWE-693 โ–ผ

Missing X-Content-Type-Options โ€” browsers may guess file types incorrectly, which can enable content injection

This is a minor gap on its own, but it slightly raises the odds that a malicious file could be misread as something else by a visitor's browser, helping a separate attack succeed.

Example: A user-uploaded file intended to be harmless (like an image) is reinterpreted by the browser as executable script because the server never told it what the file actually was, letting an unrelated vulnerability turn into a working attack.

Add: 'add_header X-Content-Type-Options "nosniff" always;' (Nginx) or 'Header always set X-Content-Type-Options nosniff' (Apache). This is a one-line fix that takes 2 minutes.

CWE-693 โ€” Protection Mechanism Failure
A security safeguard that should be protecting the system is missing, disabled, or not strong enough.

Missing Referrer-Policy Header
Port HTTPS
LOW Fix within 1 month CWE-16 โ–ผ

Missing Referrer-Policy โ€” page URLs (which may include sensitive data) are shared with third-party sites your pages link to

If any of your page addresses contain sensitive details (like a password-reset token or account ID), that information could leak to outside sites your pages link to โ€” a small but easily avoidable privacy gap.

Example: A customer clicks an outbound link from a page whose URL happens to include an account ID or a password-reset token, and that full address โ€” token included โ€” is handed to the destination site in the Referer header.

Add: 'add_header Referrer-Policy "strict-origin-when-cross-origin" always;' (Nginx) or 'Header always set Referrer-Policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin' (Apache).

CWE-16 โ€” Configuration
The weakness comes from how the software was configured, not from a flaw in its code.

Missing Permissions-Policy Header
Port HTTPS
LOW Monitor CWE-693 โ–ผ

Missing Permissions-Policy โ€” browser features like camera, microphone, and location aren't restricted for embedded third-party scripts

If you ever embed third-party ads, widgets, or analytics scripts, they could request a visitor's camera, microphone, or location without you intending to allow it โ€” an avoidable privacy risk for your customers.

Example: An embedded ad network's script requests the visitor's location or microphone access through a permission prompt the site owner never intended to allow, simply because nothing in the page's headers restricted it.

Add: 'add_header Permissions-Policy "camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()" always;' Adjust based on what your site actually uses. This limits what ad/analytics scripts can access.

CWE-693 โ€” Protection Mechanism Failure
A security safeguard that should be protecting the system is missing, disabled, or not strong enough.

Exposed .DS_Store File
Port FILE
LOW Fix within 1 month CWE-552 โ–ผ

a macOS .DS_Store file is publicly accessible, which can reveal the names of other files in the same folder

This file can list the names of other files on the server in the same folder, sometimes giving an attacker hints about other things to probe for.

Example: An attacker parses this file to see the names of other files in the same folder โ€” sometimes turning up a backup file or admin script that was never meant to be discoverable.

Delete the file and add a server rule to block it. Nginx: 'location ~ /\.DS_Store$ { deny all; }'.

CWE-552 โ€” Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties
Files that should be private can be reached by people who shouldn't have access to them.

No Abuse Reports Found for Public IP
Port HTTPS
INFO Informational โ–ผ

Public IP 108.179.252.18 (hosted by Oracle Corporation) has no abuse reports on AbuseIPDB in the last 90 days.

A clean IP reputation is a good sign โ€” no other indication needed here.

No action required.

Hosting Network Identified
Port HTTPS
INFO Informational โ–ผ

Public IP 108.179.252.18 is registered to HostGator.com LLC โ€” network: HGBLOCK-5 โ€” block: 108.179.192.0 โ€“ 108.179.255.255.

This is informational โ€” it tells you (and anyone else who looks it up) which hosting provider or network actually operates this IP. Useful for confirming you're hosted where you expect, or for context if the IP reputation check above flags anything.

No action required โ€” this is identifying information, not a vulnerability.

โœ… What You're Doing Right

Your server is reachable, which means the web checks and SSL analysis were able to run successfully.

๐Ÿš€ Next Steps

Start with the 2 HIGH risk finding(s) today โ€” these are your most urgent risks. First, address 'cPanel Exposed': Restrict access to /cpanel/ by IP allowlist, move it to a non-standard path, or disable it if not needed. Then work through the remaining findings in order of severity.

โฌ‡๏ธ Download PDF
This report is for informational purposes only and represents a point-in-time automated scan. It is not a substitute for a professional penetration test.
Generated by SecureCheck ยท August 28, 2026