3
/10

Security Report

riftfarer.com
MEDIUM RISK โ–ฒ up from 2/10 last scan
Scan DateSeptember 21, 2026
Scan Time05:21 AM
Open Ports0
Public IP172.67.154.129
AI ModelRule-based (AI unavailable)
2
High Risk
2
Medium Risk
3
Low / Info
0
Total Open Ports
๐Ÿ“‹ Executive Summary

The security scan of riftfarer.com found 7 issues including 2 high-risk and 2 medium-risk findings. The most critical issue is 'Missing SPF Record โ€” Email Spoofing Possible' which requires immediate attention. Full remediation steps are provided for each finding below.

A risk score of 3/10 (MEDIUM) indicates your business has security issues that need attention. The higher the score, the greater the chance of a breach, ransomware, or data theft.
โšก Top Recommendations
1
Missing SPF Record โ€” Email Spoofing Possible: Add an SPF TXT record to your DNS listing every service that actually sends mail for this domain โ€” leaving one out will cause its mail to fail SPF and possibly get rejected.
2
Missing DMARC Record โ€” Email Impersonation Risk: Add a DMARC TXT record to your DNS.
3
HTTP Not Redirecting to HTTPS: Add a permanent redirect from HTTP to HTTPS.
Missing SPF Record โ€” Email Spoofing Possible
Port DNS
HIGH Fix immediately CWE-290 โ–ผ

No SPF record โ€” there's no DNS-level list of which mail servers are authorized to send using this domain's envelope sender, so any server can pass an SPF check for your domain

Without SPF, nothing tells receiving mail servers which senders are legitimate for this domain's SMTP envelope, making it easier for forged mail to get through โ€” and easier for your own legitimate mail to be misjudged as spam. Note that SPF on its own, even correctly configured, doesn't stop the visible 'From:' address a recipient sees from being spoofed โ€” that requires DMARC (see below) to enforce alignment between SPF/DKIM and the From header.

Example: A customer receives an email that looks exactly like it's from the business โ€” same display name, same domain โ€” asking them to 'confirm' a payment or click a link, with nothing in DNS to stop the forgery or warn the recipient.

Add an SPF TXT record to your DNS listing every service that actually sends mail for this domain โ€” leaving one out will cause its mail to fail SPF and possibly get rejected. Log into your domain registrar, go to DNS, add a TXT record for '@' with a value matching your provider: Google Workspace: 'v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all' | Microsoft 365: 'v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all'. If you use additional senders (helpdesk, marketing platform, invoicing tool, etc.), add each as its own 'include:' entry in the same record โ€” a domain can only have one SPF TXT record, so don't create a second one. Use https://mxtoolbox.com/spf.aspx to verify, then add a DMARC record too so the visible From address is covered as well.

CWE-290 โ€” Authentication Bypass by Spoofing
The login or identity check can be tricked by faking trusted information, letting an attacker in without real credentials.

Missing DMARC Record โ€” Email Impersonation Risk
Port DNS
HIGH Fix immediately CWE-290 โ–ผ

No DMARC record โ€” your domain has zero email authentication enforcement, making it trivial to impersonate your business

This makes it significantly easier for scammers to send convincing fake emails 'from' your business โ€” a common tactic in invoice fraud and phishing โ€” which can directly cost your customers money and damage trust in your brand.

Example: A scammer sends an invoice-fraud email that appears to come straight from the business's own domain; with no DMARC record in place, nothing tells the recipient's mail provider the message is forged, so it lands in the inbox looking completely legitimate.

Add a DMARC TXT record to your DNS. Go to your domain registrar's DNS settings, add a TXT record for '_dmarc' (not '@') with value: 'v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:youremail@yourdomain.com' Start at p=none โ€” this only turns on reporting, nothing is blocked yet. Review the aggregate reports for a few weeks to confirm every legitimate mail source for this domain (email provider, helpdesk, marketing tools, etc.) is passing DMARC alignment, then move to p=quarantine, and finally p=reject once you're confident nothing legitimate will be caught. Verify at https://mxtoolbox.com/dmarc.aspx

CWE-290 โ€” Authentication Bypass by Spoofing
The login or identity check can be tricked by faking trusted information, letting an attacker in without real credentials.

HTTP Not Redirecting to HTTPS
Port HTTP
MEDIUM Fix within 1 week CWE-319 โ–ผ

Visiting http:// doesn't redirect to https:// โ€” some visitors may use an unencrypted connection without knowing

Anyone who types or clicks an http:// link is sending their activity on your site โ€” potentially including form data or passwords โ€” unencrypted, where it can be read by anyone on the same public wifi or compromised network.

Example: A customer types the domain into their browser without 'https://', lands on the unencrypted version of the site, and submits a form before ever reaching the secure page โ€” sending that data in plain text the whole time.

Add a permanent redirect from HTTP to HTTPS. Nginx: add 'return 301 https://$host$request_uri;' in your port 80 server block. Apache: add 'RewriteRule ^ https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]' in your .htaccess. Cloudflare users: go to SSL/TLS > Edge Certificates > enable 'Always Use HTTPS'.

CWE-319 โ€” Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information
Sensitive data is sent over the network unencrypted, so anyone monitoring the connection can read it.

DKIM Not Detected Under Common Selectors
Port DNS
MEDIUM Fix within 1 week CWE-290 โ–ผ

No DKIM record found under common selector names โ€” this does not confirm DKIM is unconfigured, only that it wasn't found under any of the selector names checked; many providers use a custom or provider-specific selector this check can't guess

If DKIM genuinely isn't configured, email providers increasingly use it as a trust signal, and its absence can make legitimate emails more likely to be flagged as suspicious or land in spam. But this check only queries a fixed list of common selector names (default, google, mail, etc.) โ€” many providers assign a random or account-specific selector, so this finding should be treated as 'couldn't confirm DKIM,' not 'DKIM is definitely missing.'

Example: A legitimate invoice email from the business gets flagged as suspicious or dropped into spam by the recipient's mail provider, simply because there's no DKIM signature to prove the message wasn't altered or forged in transit โ€” this only actually happens if DKIM is truly unconfigured, which this check alone can't confirm.

First confirm whether DKIM is actually configured: check your email provider's admin console (Google Workspace: Admin console > Apps > Gmail > Authenticate email; Microsoft 365: Defender > Email authentication > DKIM) for the exact selector name in use, since it's often not one of the common defaults this scan checks. If it turns out DKIM genuinely isn't enabled, turn it on there and add the resulting TXT record to DNS. If you're not sure how to check, share the selector name your provider gives you and this can be verified directly.

CWE-290 โ€” Authentication Bypass by Spoofing
The login or identity check can be tricked by faking trusted information, letting an attacker in without real credentials.

No Abuse Reports Found for Public IP
Port HTTPS
INFO Informational โ–ผ

Public IP 172.67.154.129 (hosted by Cloudflare, Inc.) has no abuse reports on AbuseIPDB in the last 90 days.

A clean IP reputation is a good sign โ€” no other indication needed here.

No action required.

Hosting Network Identified
Port HTTPS
INFO Informational โ–ผ

Public IP 172.67.154.129 is registered to Cloudflare, Inc. โ€” network: CLOUDFLARENET โ€” block: 172.64.0.0 โ€“ 172.71.255.255.

This is informational โ€” it tells you (and anyone else who looks it up) which hosting provider or network actually operates this IP. Useful for confirming you're hosted where you expect, or for context if the IP reputation check above flags anything.

No action required โ€” this is identifying information, not a vulnerability.

โœ… What You're Doing Right

Your server is reachable, which means the web checks and SSL analysis were able to run successfully.

๐Ÿš€ Next Steps

Start with the 2 HIGH risk finding(s) today โ€” these are your most urgent risks. First, address 'Missing SPF Record โ€” Email Spoofing Possible': Add an SPF TXT record to your DNS listing every service that actually sends mail for this domain โ€” leaving one out will cause its mail to fail SPF and possibly get rejected. Then work through the remaining findings in order of severity.

โฌ‡๏ธ Download PDF
This report is for informational purposes only and represents a point-in-time automated scan. It is not a substitute for a professional penetration test.
Generated by SecureCheck ยท September 21, 2026